Online access and copy requests are not available for this item. You may request to be notified of when this becomes available digitally.
- GLC#
- GLC09392
- Type
- Documents
- Date
- 20 December 1866
- Author/Creator
- Lee, Fitzhugh, 1835-1905
- Title
- [Account of Army of Northern Virginia cavalry operations]
- Place Written
- s.l.
- Pagination
- 47 p. :
- Primary time period
- Civil War and Reconstruction, 1861-1877
- Sub-Era
- Reconstruction
"…praise to the valor, endurance & patriotism of the noble band of troopers I had the honor to Comd. … they at least did their whole duty in the unsuccessful struggle in which we were engaged."
Opening with the Wilderness and Spotsylvania battles, Fitz Lee provides a detailed account of Army of Northern Virginia cavalry operations, fighting practically non-stop from May 4, 1864 to April 9, 1865. Fitz Lee's account is especially informative for the campaigns of the spring and summer of 1864, including the Wilderness, Spotsylvania, the opening of the Petersburg siege, and Philip Sheridan's Shenandoah Valley campaign. The exploits of little-known cavalry officers such as Major James Breathed spring from the pages. Lee's descriptions of Yellow Tavern and Trevilian's, two of the largest all-cavalry battles of the war, are incredible, and his comments on Winchester explore the strategic implications of the battle: "I have dwelt thus long & minutely upon this battle…partially because I believe it occasioned the fall of Richmond by ultimately liberating a large army flushed with victory for Grant's use, while we could only use a small counteractive element, the small remnant from a dispirited band … there is but one conclusion to draw viz. that the battle of Winchester ought never to have been fought."
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
- Copyright Notice
- The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.