Jefferson, Thomas (1743-1826) to Henry Knox
High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also order a pdf of the image from us here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC02437.04700 Author/Creator: Jefferson, Thomas (1743-1826) Place Written: New York, New York Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 26 August 1790 Pagination: 2 p. : docket ; 25 x 20.5 cm. Order a Copy
Jefferson, Secretary of State, writes Knox to hastily give his thoughts on the "treaty of Hopewell, the act of cession of N. Carolina and the act of acceptance by Congress." States that Congress's act of acceptance followed the Treaty of Hopewell, and that North Carolina can not use their right of preemption to take away the right of occupation of the Cherokees. The "question would be a disagreeable one between the general government, a particular government, and individuals." Jefferson thinks purchasing from the Cherokees the right of occupation is one solution. Docketed by Knox.
[draft]
New York Aug. 26, 1790.
Dear Sir
On the hasty view which the shortness of time permits me to take of the treaty of Hopewell, the act of cession of N. Carolina & the act of acceptance by Congress, I hazard the following sentiments.
Were the treaty of Hopewell, and the act of acceptance of Congress to stand in any point in direct opposition to each other, I should consider the act of acceptance as void in that point: because the treaty is a law made by two parties, & not revocable by one of them either acting alone or in conjunction with a third party. if we consider the acceptance as a legislative act of Congress, it is the act of one party only; if we consider it as a [struck: convention] treaty between Congress & N. Carolina, it is [struck: still] but a subsequent treaty with another power, & cannot make void a preceding one, with a different power.
But I see no such opposition between these two instruments. the Cherokees were entitled to the sole occupation of the lands within the limits guaranteed to them. the state of N. Carolina, according to the jus gentium established for America by universal usage, had only a right of preemption of these lands against all other nations. it could convey then to it's citizens only this right of preemption, and the right of occupation could not be united to it till obtained by the U.S. from the Cherokees. the act of cession of N. Carolina only [struck: confirms the] preserves the rights of it's citizens, in the same state as [2] they would have been, had that act never been passed. it does not make imperfect titles, perfect; but only prevents their being made worse. Congress, by their act, accept on these conditions. the claimants of N.C. then [inserted: and also the Cherokees] are exactly where they would have been, had neither the act of cession nor that of acceptance been ever made; that is, [strikeout] the latter possess the right of occupation, & the former the right of preemption.
Tho' these deductions seem clear enough, yet the question would be a disagreeable one between the general government, a particular government, & individuals, and it would seem very desireable to draw all the claims of preemption within a certain limit, by commuting for those out of it, and then to purchase of the Cherokees the right of occupation.
I have the honor to be, my dear Sir
Yours respectfully & affectionately
Th: Jefferson
[on bottom of page one]
The Secretary at War.
[docket]
Augt 26, 1790
Mr Jefferson
The treaty of Hopewell
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.