Dickinson, John (1732-1808)
to Catharine Macaulay
Make Gilder Lehrman your Home for History to view images from the Collection
Already a member?
Please click here to login and access this page if you are a K-12 teacher or student, or have purchased a site subscription..
How to subscribe
Click here to get a free subscription if you are a K-12 educator or student, and here for more information on the Affiliate School Program, which provides even more benefits.
Otherwise, click here for information on a paid subscription for those who are not K-12 educators or students.
Close
Make Gilder Lehrman your Home for History
Become an Affiliate School to have free access to the Gilder Lehrman site and all its features.
Click here to start your Affiliate School application today! You will have free access while your application is being processed.
Individual K-12 educators and students can also get a free subscription to the site by making a site account with a school-affiliated email address. Click here to do so now!
Close
Make Gilder Lehrman your Home for History
Why Gilder Lehrman?
Your subscription grants you access to archives of rare historical documents, lectures by top historians, and a wealth of original historical material, while also helping to support history education in schools nationwide. Click here to see the kinds of historical resources to which you'll have access and here to read more about the Institute's educational programs.
Individual subscription: $25
Click here to sign up for an individual subscription to the Gilder Lehrman site.
K-12 School subscription: $195
Click here to sign up for an institutional subscription, which allows site access to all faculty and students in a single school, or all visitors to a library branch.
Place Written: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Type: Autograph letter signed
Date: 31 October 1770
Pagination: 4 p. : docket ; 23 x 19 cm.
Summary of Content: Argues that the Freeholders of America are firm in the cause of liberty. Associates the colonial cause with virtue and piety and implicitly identifies Britain with luxury and corruption. It is notable that so many colonists addressed their appeals to an Englishwoman.
Full Transcript: A class of men in all states too fondly devoted to profitable tho inglorious Tranquility, have their the same addiction to private interests here, that they have shewn the same addiction to private interest here, that they have shewn in every other part of the world. But the freeholders of this Continent, the really respectable Body of the People, I think, are still firm to the Cause of Liberty. To engage them to act with more spirit of [steadiness] in controlling the sliding Patriotism of Merchants, it will be proper, I apprehend, to wait awhile till the administration encouraged by a supposed Victory, shall with still more violent audacity, renew their attacks on our Freedom.... , I trust we have Virtue & Resolution. Yet certain it is-that no mortal can engage in a more difficult Enterprise than to rouse a People in vindication of their artfully invaded Rights--to unite them--& to maintain that union, in a persevering adherence to prudent measures for obtaining Redress. , Your generous Labors, Madam, in rendering Justice to deceased worthies will I doubt not, facilitate the Endeavors of future Patriots throughout the British Dominion in every age. Your attention to America in particular is very obliging.... [Body of text]
Background: The escalating conflict with Britain after 1763 forced the colonists to define their identity as well as the nature of sovereignty and authority through practical action and philosophic reflection. Republican ideology served as a way to articulate a sense of identity. Increasingly, the colonists envisioned themselves as a people emancipated from religious and political despotism, as a simple cooperative people whose virtue and independence rested on land ownership. , Signer of the U.S. Constitution., , A Philadelphia landlord and lawyer, John Dickinson (1732-1808) played a critical role in mobilizing popular opposition to the Townshend Acts. In a series of newspaper essays, he argued against all parliamentary taxes--both ”direct” taxes and ”indirect” taxes. Far from being duties to regulate trade, the Townshend Acts were taxes to raise revenue. Taxes disguised as trade duties, he wrote, were ”a most dangerous innovation,” with the potential for turning the colonists into ”abject slaves.” Significantly, like Brutus, Dickinson can assume that all white colonists, regardless of class or occupation, are ”free,” and are thus vulnerable to British ”enslavement.”
Order Image
Add comment