Make Gilder Lehrman your Home for History to view images from the Collection
Already a member?
Please click here to login and access this page if you are a K-12 teacher or student, or have purchased a site subscription..
How to subscribe
Click here to get a free subscription if you are a K-12 educator or student, and here for more information on the Affiliate School Program, which provides even more benefits.
Otherwise, click here for information on a paid subscription for those who are not K-12 educators or students.
Close
Make Gilder Lehrman your Home for History
Become an Affiliate School to have free access to the Gilder Lehrman site and all its features.
Click here to start your Affiliate School application today! You will have free access while your application is being processed.
Individual K-12 educators and students can also get a free subscription to the site by making a site account with a school-affiliated email address. Click here to do so now!
Close
Make Gilder Lehrman your Home for History
Why Gilder Lehrman?
Your subscription grants you access to archives of rare historical documents, lectures by top historians, and a wealth of original historical material, while also helping to support history education in schools nationwide. Click here to see the kinds of historical resources to which you'll have access and here to read more about the Institute's educational programs.
Individual subscription: $25
Click here to sign up for an individual subscription to the Gilder Lehrman site.
K-12 School subscription: $195
Click here to sign up for an institutional subscription, which allows site access to all faculty and students in a single school, or all visitors to a library branch.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC00544
Place Written: Norwich, Connecticut
Type: Autograph letter signed
Date: 5 October 1866
Pagination: 6 p. ; 23 x 14.3 cm.
Summary of Content: Foster, a U.S. senator from Connecticut, discusses his views on reconstruction with Wakeman, a lawyer. Foster says that he would restrict the right to vote to those with ”capacity and virtue,” but that it would be ”arbitrary, unjust, and tyrannical to make any discriminations…on account of color…” Writing extensively about the rights, especially voting rights, of the ”negro,” he states ”There is no more sense in talking of a man’s natural right to vote, than there is in talking of his natural right to be the Chief Justice, or the President of the United States…It is dangerous to commit so important a power to any who have not both capacity and virtue - I would restrict the right of suffrage to those who had both - to such I would give it, no matter about their color, the ignorant and vicious I would exclude…”
Full Transcript: Norwich, Con., Oct. 5. 1866 -, My dear Sir,, In your favor of the 3d, recd. last eveg., you ask my views as to the reconstruction of the States -, Briefly then, I think the late rebel States should be allowed representation in both branches of Congress as soon as they elect their [inserted: Senators & Representatives] according to the requirements of the Constitution and laws of the United States - Persons so elected must be loyal to the United States, and I am content to take as the test of loyalty, the oaths now prescribed by the Constitution & laws, admitting those [2] who can take those oaths, and excluding those who cannot - So much for reconstruction -, Then ”in regard to the negro.” - He is now, unquestionably, a citizen of the United States, whatever may have been his former condition - As a citizen, it is arbitrary, unjust, and tyrannical, to make any discriminations against him on account of color - A citizen with black hair, or black skin, should be entitled to the same rights and privileges as one whose hair or skin is of a different color -, [3] Of course this disposes of the question of suffrage, so far as color is concerned - I may add however, that Congress has not, in my opinion, any power to fix the terms of suffrage in any State, and if it had, it would be most unwise to grant it to every male person twenty one years of age - I have no incense at the popular shrine of ”Manhood suffrage” - I would not base the right to vote on muscle, mature or immature, but on mind and morals, making an exception, in favor of those who have borne arms in defense of the country - They should [4] be allowed to vote - Every man who has fought for his country should be entitled to a voice in its government - As to others, it should depend on intelligence and moral character, and I would raise the standard of both, as now existing in this State, rather than lower it - The ”natural right to vote,” is harped on by many who would perhaps be puzzled to [struck: st] inform us in what state of Nature any men were ever called on to vote at all - In the United States we live in society -organized Society - we live under free institutions of government - these rest, under God, on the intelligence & moral virtue of the people - [5] We have enough - far too much of ignorance and depravity to struggle with now - Let these dangerous elements be increased, let the control of our government fall into the hands of the ignorant and vicious, and all our institutions, of which we boast so much, the beauty and glory of the whole earth, will be prostrated in the dust, and anarchy and ruin will overspread our land -, There is no more sense in talking of a man’s natural right to vote, than there is in talking of his natural right [6] to be the Chief Justice, or the President of the United States - Voting is the exercise of political power - [inserted: an elector is an officer -] The vote of one single elector may determine who shall hold either or both those offices - It is dangerous to commit so important a power to any who have not both capacity and virtue - I would restrict the right of suffrage to those who had both - to such I would give it, no matter about their color, the ignorant and vicious I would exclude -, I have written hastily,, but remain yours very truly, L.F.S. Foster, Mr. Wakeman, Esq.
Order Image
Add comment