WPA Poster showing half an eagle and half a painter's
palette. (Courtesy of the Library of Congress)
Are Artists “Workers”?
by Elizabeth Broun
As I write this essay in February 2009, the nation
is engaged in a great discussion about how to restore
confidence during the worst economic downturn since
the Great Depression. One contentious issue is whether
and how cultural initiatives should play a role in government
recovery efforts. 1934: A New Deal for Artists ---an
exhibition on view at the Smithsonian American Art Museum,
where I serve as Director---focuses on the first United
States government program ever to provide direct support
for artists and provides insight into this discussion.
[For a slideshow of paintings on display in this exhibition,
visit the website of the Smithsonian
American Art Museum.]
This exhibition began as a way to save money in the
Museum’s seriously eroded budget, a response to
our own internal “economic crisis.” We decided
to forego two expensive temporary exhibitions and instead
fill the galleries with permanent collection objects
for ten months. Deputy Chief Curator George Gurney proposed
that we commemorate the seventy-fifth anniversary of
the first New Deal arts program, called the Public Works
of Art Project (PWAP). This seven-month program---December
1933 through June 1934---funded 3,750 artists who produced
15,600 artworks, at a cost of $1,312,000. The enormous
success of this program spawned a cluster of other New
Deal arts initiatives, some persisting into the early
1940s. The Museum has 180 paintings made under the PWAP
program, among more than 3,000 artworks from the 1930s
in our collection. Dr. Gurney selected fifty-five for
this exhibition and book, and Curatorial Associate Dr.
Ann Prentice Wagner researched each work and wrote entries
presenting newly recovered information. Dr. Roger Kennedy,
author of a forthcoming book called When Art Worked
(November 2009), who knew key players from the New Deal
during his own later government service, wrote an essay
for the book conveying his passion for the ambitious
goals of the New Deal.
A glance back to the 1930s shows that many New Deal
programs were innovative, even radical, in treating
artists, writers, and playwrights as workers deserving
of support. This was new in America, where artists since
colonial times had been considered marginal “extras”
in our society. John Singleton Copley (1738--1815) complained
that he was regarded as “no better than a cobbler.”
Thomas Eakins (1844--1916) lamented that “My honours
are misunderstanding, persecution, and neglect, enhanced
because unsought.” John Sloan (1871--1951) famously
said, “The artist in America is regarded as the
unwanted cockroach in the kitchen of a frontier society.”
All that changed in the mid-1930s, as New Deal programs
were created for unemployed artists eligible for government
relief. Artists, newly defined by their government as
workers, produced an unprecedented number of artworks,
literary works, and theatrical performances, launching
careers for many who became famous in later years. President
Roosevelt is said to have declared, “One hundred
years from now my administration will be known for its
art, not for its relief.”
A capsule history of New Deal programs for artists
is easily found on the Internet, briefly and incompletely
summarized here:
The Public Works of Art Project (PWAP)---which
supported the paintings in our exhibition---was created
“to give work to artists by arranging to have
competent representatives of the profession embellish
public buildings.” Artists were encouraged to
portray “the American Scene.” With this
minimal guidance, they turned to local and regional
subjects and created a picture of the country striving
to survive through hard work and true grit. They were
inspired by the idea that their art would be displayed
in public spaces for broad audiences. President Roosevelt
awarded the ultimate honor by selecting thirty-two PWAP
artworks---seven of which are in this exhibition---to
hang in America’s premier public space, the White
House. Another 130 paintings hung in the Department
of Labor Building, while 451 were displayed in the House
of Representatives Office Building. Interestingly, thirty
percent of the artists in this exhibition were in their
twenties in 1934, just trying to get established; twenty-five
percent were first-generation immigrants.
In 1934 the Section of Painting and Sculpture
was initiated to commission murals and sculptures for
federal buildings across America, especially post offices.
One percent of federal building construction funds was
set aside for “embellishment.” Artists submitted
designs that addressed local subjects or “past
or present history,” and a jury determined the
selection. Altogether, 1,400 murals were created in
more than 1,300 cities under this program. (In the 1970s,
the “one percent for art” concept was revived
as the Art-in-Architecture program by the General Services
Administration.) Although some murals were lost or destroyed,
many have been restored and are still on public display.
John Steuart Curry, Rockwell Kent, and Willem de Kooning
are just a few artists whose murals survive today.
The Works Progress Administration (WPA)
ran from 1935 through 1943, spending $12 billion to
give jobs to nine million people, with three-fourths
of the money going for construction projects. But the
WPA took a broad view of “workers,” with
special programs devised for writers, musicians, actors,
and artists. “Why not?” asked President
Roosevelt, when criticized for including all these in
his recovery effort. “They are human beings. They
have to live.” Under the WPA umbrella, the Federal
Art Project (FAP) employed more than 5,000
artists who created 225,000 works of art for the American
people, and these are still seen in public buildings
and museums across the country. Some worked in their
studios and submitted artworks to the government for
libraries and schools. Others worked at community art
centers or taught art to wider audiences. Will Barnet,
Adolph Gottlieb, Archibald Motley, David Park, and Jackson
Pollock, among many others, got their start on the WPA.
One of the most interesting FAP programs was the Index
of American Design (1935--1942), employing
hundreds of artists who made watercolor illustrations
of American decorative art objects in museums and private
collections. This enterprise was part of a larger search
for a distinctive American art and identity---a search
for the American soul through the utilitarian objects
of ordinary life in a democracy, inspired by a new passion
for early folk art. Today, 18,000 of these watercolor
renderings of traditional arts and crafts made before
1890 are housed in the National Gallery of Art, an unparalleled
record of Americana.
In 1937 a group of photographers employed by the Farm
Security Administration set out to create a
pictorial record of the impact of hard times on rural
America. Eighty thousand documentary photographs were
distributed to newspapers and magazines to show the
devastation of the Dust Bowl and grinding poverty on
agricultural lands and people, and some were featured
in a 1938 exhibition called How American People
Live, producing an overwhelming public response
that made New Deal programs more popular than ever.
Dorothea Lange’s “Migrant Mother”
and Walker Evans’s Alabama sharecroppers are among
these haunting images about profound distress and human
dignity. In later years, the program’s photographers
documented America’s mobilization effort for World
War II. Today, 164,000 FSA photographs are in the Library
of Congress collections as an invaluable resource and
moving tribute to hard times.
The Federal Writers Project (FWP)
undertook the most ambitious effort ever in the field
of American history, fanning across the country to interview
town inhabitants and prepare forty-eight critically
acclaimed state guidebooks (plus Alaska Territory, Puerto
Rico, and Washington, D.C.) called The American
Guide Series, which are still classics today. The
Writers Project recorded 2,300 first-person accounts
of slavery that were donated to the Library of Congress
and assembled in 1941 as the seventeen-volume Slave
Narratives: A Folk History of Slavery in the United
States. The 6,600 writers in the Federal Writers
Project, who came from unemployment rolls, indexed newspapers
and compiled local histories, oral histories, ethnographies,
children’s books, and other works; interestingly,
their editors were not required to be eligible for relief!
Among the writers who got their start on this project
were Saul Bellow, John Cheever, Loren Eiseley, Zora
Neale Hurston, John Steinbeck, Studs Terkel, and Richard
Wright.
The Federal Theatre Project (FTP),
established in August 1935, put vaudevillians, actors,
directors, playwrights, musicians, dancers, box office
staff, ushers, designers, and other theater workers
on relief rolls to produce performances relevant to
local and regional areas. New York City had units for
classical theater, new plays, vaudeville, children’s
plays, puppet shows, and caravan productions; most of
the productions toured to rural areas. The FTP also
included African American, Yiddish, Italian, Spanish,
French, and German units. At first the theater offerings
were billed as “free, adult, and uncensored”
and were noted for some of the most innovative stagings
of the era, but tumultuous times led to radical left-wing
productions. Living Newspaper plays focused on current
issues like farm policy, syphilis testing, and housing
inequities that provoked a backlash and resignations.
Funding for the Federal Theatre Project was cancelled
in June 1939, but not before helping to establish careers
for Arthur Miller, Orson Welles, John Houseman, Martin
Ritt, Elia Kazan, and Marc Blitzstein, among the 12,700
people employed. Approximately 5,000 FTP playscripts
and documentation related to 2,500 titles are in the
Library of Congress, with 13,000 online images of stage
and costume designs, still photos, posters, and more.
One other New Deal program inadvertently opened the
door to America’s greatest rediscovery of its
people’s origins and development. When the Social
Security system was created in 1935, birth information
was required for millions of citizens, to determine
their eligibility. The Census Bureau hired the Rand
Corporation to devise a coding system based on Soundex---a
phonetic indexing system created in 1918---as an aid
in researching the 1880 census records. Soundex allowed
an easy search across early records that were wildly
variable in spellings and immigrant dialects. In a massive
effort, hundreds of WPA workers created Soundex indexes
for the 1880, 1900, and 1920 censuses, including the
ages of each family member. Today, at the National Archives,
where the census records are housed, these Soundex indexes
are the point of departure for every person embarking
on a genealogical search for family members barely remembered
or lost to history. Perhaps no New Deal program has
done more to connect Americans to their own histories
and to the nation. Thanks to the Soundex workers in
the 1930s, Americans continue today to discover the
richness of America’s development as a nation,
one family at a time.
It would be easy to extend this inventory, if space
permitted. For instance, as a teenager interested in
fine arts, I frequently drew the beautiful stone wall
encircling the cemetery in my hometown of Independence,
Kansas, which was built by the Civilian Conservation
Corps (CCC). A colleague commutes to downtown
Washington each day across the CCC’s wonderful
bridge in Rock Creek Park. And a friend still talks
about Timberland Lodge at Mt. Hood---just one of the
grand lodges in the national parks built by the CCC---complete
with paintings in the rooms and carved newel posts.
The CCC operated from 1933 to 1942 and did everything
from beekeeping to installing telephone lines to furniture
manufacture, in addition to its essential work of initiating
the first conservation programs on national, state,
and municipal lands. One benefit was enjoyed for decades---the
five million trees planted under this program. The CCC
was limited at first to young men aged eighteen to twenty-five,
whose fathers were on relief. At the time of entry,
seventy percent of enrollees were malnourished and poorly
clothed; the average age was eighteen to nineteen. Veterans,
Indians, and African Americans lived in separate camps.
The legacy of New Deal cultural programs seems indisputable
today as we cherish and mine the resources these “workers”
left us. But the renewed debate about whether artists
are worthy of recovery support calls all into question
again. What seems clear is that America gains in the
long term when it invests in its own heritage and people,
conceived in a large way.
Elizabeth Broun
is the Margaret and Terry Stent Director of the Smithsonian
American Art Museum.
|