Traitors and Spies in the Time of War: How the Supreme Court determined who would live and who would die
by Jack Barellies
Overview:
In April 1865 over 600,000 Americans lay dead from battle wounds and
other causes directly related to their service in the armies of the Confederacy
and Union during the four year Civil War. If we adjusted the number of
dead to correspond to our modern population of 300 million it would be
approximately 5,000,000 men and women -- a truly gargantuan number.
Even at that time there was little question about the chain of events
that led to the secession of first South Carolina and eventually eleven
states total. While Southern apologists then, and some historians now,
argue that the blame for secession is shared between North and South,
no one then or now disputes who led the Confederacy: President Jefferson
Davis and General Robert E. Lee. Yet neither man was ever tried or convicted
of treason (an act they most certainly committed) by either a military
tribunal or a civilian court.
Almost eighty years later, in the middle of the night of June 13, 1942
on a beach near Amagansett, NY, four German saboteurs armed with weapons
and explosives and other devices rowed ashore from a German U-boat on
a mission to blow up and otherwise disable American defense plants. These
four men, all of whom had lived for a time in United States before the
war, along with another similarly equipped group of four enemy agents
who came ashore four days later near Jacksonville, FL, after disembarking
from another U-boat were quickly captured and charged with spying -- a
capital offense.
Though neither group accomplished any of their goals of industrial sabotage,
and some historians question how serious the eight men were about actually
carrying out acts of sabotage, there was no doubt they were equipped to
do significant damage. As America was at war during this time, the decision
was made to try the eight by military tribunal set up by the government
for that purpose (not the existing civilian courts). The court cases started
on July 8, 1942 and concluded with the conviction of all eight on August
4, 1942. All were sentenced to death and, after President Roosevelt commuted
the sentences of two of the men who had volunteered information to the
government, six were executed at the District of Columbia Jail on August
8, 1942.
Two Supreme Court Cases, Ex Parte Milligan (1866) and Ex
Parte Quirin (1942) are legally responsible for the different outcomes
experienced by President Davis and General Lee and the eight German saboteurs.
In this lesson, students and teachers will study and discuss the different
court cases and their effect on these two events in particular and their
relevance on legal proceedings relating to the war on terror today.
Objectives
-
Students will understand the basic facts surrounding both events
which precipitated the two court cases studied. This knowledge will
include:
- At least a cursory understanding of the plot that Confederate
sympathizer Lambdin P. Milligan and four other men were charged
with participating in.
- An understanding of Operation Pastorius (the case of the German
saboteurs), both the plan and what actually happened.
- Students will develop an understanding of the two court cases. This
understanding will include:
- Knowledge of the basic facts of the Ex Parte Milligan case
including the Supreme Court ruling.
- Understanding the way in which the Ex Parte Milligan case
affected the treatment of Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee after
the war.
- Knowledge of the Ex Parte Quirin case including the ramifications
of the court's decision about the eight Nazi agents.
- Students will explore and analyze a number of primary and secondary
sources as well as multimedia resources as they study these cases.
- Students will compare the two Supreme Court decisions and how they
affected President Davis, General Lee and the eight German saboteurs.
- Students and teachers will have the option of extending their newly
learned knowledge to discuss and debate how it applies to terrorists
both foreign and domestic today.
Handouts:
Activity 1: Ex
Parte Milligan Handout (PDF)
Activity 2: Ex
Parte Quirin Handout (PDF)
Activity 3: Comparison
Chart -- this is very basic, but might be useful for note taking.
Additional Print Resources:
Saboteurs: The Nazi Raid on America by Michael Dobbs. Alfred
A. Knopf, New York, 2004 (the story of the 1942 Nazi attempt to land eight
agents along the East Coast to carry out acts of sabotage).
Online Resources:
Ex Parte Milligan:
Decision of the US Supreme Court: This is the complete text
of the court's decision.
http://www.constitution.org/ussc/071-002a.htm
Decision of the US Supreme Court with notes and brief explanation
from law.jrank.org:
http://law.jrank.org/pages/13644/Ex-parte-Milligan.html
Ex Parte Quirin and Operation Pastorius:
Decision of the US Supreme Court with notes and brief explanation
from law.jrank.org:
http://law.jrank.org/pages/13645/Ex-Parte-Quirin.html
FBI Famous Cases: George John Dasch and the Nazi Saboteurs from
the FBI website.
This webpage has the booking photos of all eight men as well as other
photos from the case:
http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/famcases/nazi/nazi.htm
World War II: German Saboteurs Invade America in 1942
The full text of an article by Harvey Ardman on the failed attempt
is available at www.historynet.com. This article was first published in
World War II magazine in 1997:
http://www.historynet.com/magazines/world_war_2/3037136.html
The Keystone Commandos, from the Atlantic Monthly, February
2002
In this article, author Gary Cohen tells the story of the events leading
to the conviction of all and execution of six of the saboteurs:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200202/cohen
German Espionage and Sabotage Against the United State In World War
II.
This resource is comprised of previously secret military documents
(declassified in 1944) recording the events of 1942 and a later 1944 Nazi
attempt to land saboteurs in Maine:
http://history.navy.mil/faqs/faq114-1.htm
Saboteurs: The Nazi Raid on America (Book Review) from Historynet.com.
This review gives the highlights of the botched Nazi attempt to land saboteurs
along the East Coast and the almost equally inept response by the US Government:
http://www.historynet.com/reviews/world_war_2/3034901.html
Montauk Life: Night of the Nazis
This website gives a good overview of the events in and around Long Island
in June 1942. It also includes a brief description of the coastal defenses
in place along the Long Island shore in June 1942:
http://www.montauklife.com/history/history_night_of_the_nazis.html
Activity 1: The Treason of Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee.
- Read and discuss the following excerpt from the US Constitution:
Article III Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States, Art.
III, states:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying
war against them [Note: the States are written in the plural in 1787],
or in adhering to their [the states'] enemies, giving them aid and
comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony
of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
- What are the key facts of this excerpt from the Constitution?
- How does the Constitution define treason?
- What conditions are placed upon convicting a person of treason?
- Read the following statement:
"Regardless of one's opinion on the Southern decision to attempt
to secede from the Union the Constitution makes it clear that both
Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee (along with a host of other Confederates)
levied war against them and therefore committed treason."
- Do you agree with this statement?
- Did Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee commit treason as defined
by the Constitution?
Article III Section 3 goes on to say that:
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason,
but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture
except during the life of the person attainted.
- Congress had the power to declare treason a crime punishable by
death and it did.
- Other men were tried and convicted of treason before the Civil
War --In 1859 Abolitionist John Brown was famously convicted and
executed for committing treason against the State of Virginia at
Harpers Ferry. In an ironic twist, John Brown and his followers
were captured by Union Army Colonel, Robert E. Lee.
Why didn't the United States Government try, convict, and execute Jefferson
Davis and Robert E. Lee?
Notes for teachers:
Here are the key things to consider regarding Davis and Lee.
- They were guaranteed a trial in the locale where the crime took place
-- i.e. the South.
- They were guaranteed the option of selecting trial by a jury of their
peers.
- Where in the South could you find a jury of white men willing to unanimously
convict Robert E. Lee or Jefferson Davis?
- Ex Parte Milligan essentially forbade the US Government from
trying them in a military court.
- Neither Lee nor Davis were at the time of their treasonous activities
members of the U.S. military. Both had legally resigned their commissions
-- Davis many years earlier, Lee in early 1861 -- therefore, neither
could be tried in military courts.
Though I tell my students to avoid Wikipedia like the plague (my apologies
to Wiki-aficionados) there is an accurate and brief description of just
what Milligan was charged with and convicted for as well as a description
of the court case. It can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_Parte_Milligan
Activity 2: The German Saboteurs and Ex Parte Quirin
- Read and discuss the basic facts of Operation Pastorius:
Prior to this activity the teacher will need to go to the FBI website
and print-out the story of Operation Pastorius. The text and photos
can be easily highlighted, copied and pasted into a word document
or students can access the information at the FBI's famous cases webpage:
http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/famcases/nazi/nazi.htm
A second online resource of the landing on Long Island is available
at: http://www.montauklife.com/history/history_night_of_
the_nazis.html
-
In the
chart provided students can answer ten basic questions about Operation
Pastorius. This can also be done as part of a class discussion.
-
Ex Parte Quirin:
The eight saboteurs were tried by a military tribunal starting on
July 8, 1942 and concluding with the conviction of all eight on August
4, 1942. All were sentenced to death and after President Roosevelt
commuted the sentences of two of the men who had volunteered information
to the government the other six were executed at the District of Columbia
Jail on August 8, 1942.
While the military trial was taking place one of the defendants,
Richard Quirin, challenged the legality of the military tribunal under
which he was being tried. Quirin's lawyers argued that all eight defendants
had a right to trial in the civil courts. In their pleading they mentioned
the Ex Parte Milligan case.
The Supreme Court met in special session on July 29, 1942 and ruled
that the President had the right to order the creation of a special
military tribunal. Excerpts from the Court's decision can be found
on the sites listed below:
A brief explanation of the case can be found at: http://law.jrank.org/pages/13645/Ex-Parte-Quirin.html
This is probably more suitable for student use because it's so much
shorter than the excerpts from the Court's decision.
-
Was it legal?
Does the President have the right to try enemy spies or combatants
captured on US soil in military tribunals?
Notes for teachers:
Here are the key things to consider regarding the case of the German
Saboteurs.
- They were tried secretly -- a public announcement was not made until
later.
- There was a fear of a public trial allowing defense secrets to become
public.
- Some argue that J. Edgar Hoover (always an easy target) and other
government officials were concerned that a public trial would open their
agencies to criticism for not capturing the saboteurs on their own (without
the betrayal of the men by one of their number).
- A number of the online articles listed in the resources are critical
of the government's efforts to capture the saboteurs.
- Both the defense attorneys filing their petition for Richard Quirin
and the Supreme Court cite Ex Parte Milligan -- though both
sides view the precedent of Milligan differently.
- The citing of Ex Parte Milligan provides the opportunity
to discuss the importance of precedent in our legal system.
Extension Activities:
- The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 left 3,000 American civilians
dead. Ask your students how Osama Bin Laden and those responsible for
the attacks should be tried if they were captured.
- It might be useful to also discuss or briefly study the trials of
other recent terrorists such as Timothy McVeigh whose 1995 attack on
the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City left 168 dead,
or Theodore Kaczynski, the Unabomber. In both cases the two men were
tried and convicted in civilian courts.
Timothy McVeigh special report from CNN: http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/okc/
There is also information on McVeigh's trial on the Famous Trials
website from University of Missouri Kansas City Law Professor Doug
Linder.
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mcveigh/
mcveightrial.html
Unabomber special report from CNN: http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1997/unabomb/
|