Uncle Tom's Cabin and the Matter of Influence
by Hollis Robbins
One hundred years after Harriet Beecher Stowe published Uncle Tom’s
Cabin in 1852, the poet Langston Hughes called the novel, “the
most cussed and discussed book of its time.” Hughes’s observation
is particularly apt in that it avoids any mention of the novel’s
literary merit. George Orwell famously called it, “the best bad
book of the age.” Uncle Tom’s Cabin is arguably no
Pride and Prejudice or The Scarlet Letter. Leo Tolstoy is one of the few
critics who praise it unabashedly, calling Uncle Tom’s Cabin
a model of the “highest type” of art because it flowed from
love of God and man. So why has it been called “a verbal earthquake,
an ink-and-paper tidal wave”? How and why has it been so influential?
Uncle Tom’s Cabin, or Life Among the Lowly, is at heart
a typical nineteenth-century melodrama of cruelty, suffering, religious
devotion, broken homes, and improbable reunions. The plot in brief: the
slave Uncle Tom is sold away from his cabin and family on the Shelby plantation
in Kentucky; he serves the St. Clare family in Louisiana, from which he
is sold after the death of Eva and her father; he lands at the Legree
plantation on the Red River where he is whipped to death rather than betray
two runaway slaves. Meanwhile some slaves escape (Eliza on ice floes across
the Ohio River) and find long-lost relatives; others kill themselves and
their children. The white characters discuss politics and religion. Everybody
weeps.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin has been cussed and discussed since May
8, 1851, when the novel’s first installment appeared in abolitionist
Gamaliel Bailey’s Washington, DC weekly, The National Era. Cussers
include Southerners such as William Gilmore Simms who considered the novel
a libelous hodgepodge of bad research and flat-out lies; Reverend Joel
Parker, who threatened to sue Stowe for the “dastardly attack”
on his character; Charles Dickens, who wondered if Stowe patterned Eva
on his Little Nell; and James Baldwin, who bemoaned the sentimentality
and the powerlessness of Uncle Tom. Discussers include everybody else:
Frederick Douglass, Ralph Waldo Emerson, George Eliot, Horace Mann, Mark
Twain, Charles Dudley Warner, Henry James, and in modern times, Richard
Wright, Harold Bloom, Elaine Showalter, Ann Douglas, Henry Louis Gates,
Jr., and John Updike, who confessed to having never read the novel until
he reviewed it in The New Yorker in 2006.
Nearly everyone agrees that the reason for Uncle Tom’s Cabin’s
initial influence was a matter of timing. Its author, Harriet Beecher
Stowe, was the perfect combination of magpie, shrewd political operator,
and grieving mother. After the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, the time was
right for an anti-slavery novel and Stowe wrote one (though she claimed
later that God himself held the pen). But Stowe’s beliefs about
slavery’s effects on family did not simply manifest themselves in
a fictional story. The brutal facts of slavery did not automatically translate
themselves into an effective political tract. The reading public may have
been primed and ready for the right anti-slavery story to come along and
simply “touch a nerve” or “strike a chord,” but
why was this novel the “right” story?
Sales and readership figures demonstrate Uncle Tom’s Cabin’s
popular appeal. Readership of The National Era jumped from 17,000 to 28,000
during the story’s serialization. On March 20, 1852, John J. Jewett
& Co. published the first one-volume edition of Uncle Tom’s
Cabin and sold 5000 copies in two days. Over 100,000 copies were
sold by the end of the summer and 300,000 by March 1853. One Southern
literary critic credited new technology for the novel’s sales figures,
which relied on “steam-presses, steam-ships, steam-carriages, iron
roads, electric telegraphs, and universal peace among the reading nations
of the earth.” Hundreds of editions and millions of copies have
been sold around the world. Uncle Tom’s Cabin remains the
world’s second most translated book, after the Bible.
The literary influence of Stowe’s novel is evidenced by the immortality
of Uncle Tom, Eliza, Little Eva, Simon Legree, and Topsy. These characters
exist beyond Stowe’s tale; they have become literary archetypes.
Uncle Tom began as a Christ figure—a character like Jesus who loves
God, loves his tormentors, turns the other cheek, and shows inhuman forbearance
in the face of cruelty—but has been transformed into the perfect,
silver-haired, silent, sexless, stalwart servant. Eliza remains, however,
the model of the desperate mother who will leap across the ice to save
her child. The name “Simon Legree” is shorthand for any cruel
overseer. Topsy is the avatar of the mischief-maker, the magic urchin
who asserts her own alien status, claiming, “I spect I grow’d.
Don’t think nobody never made me.” These characters appeared
in popular poems, cartoons, and songs within weeks. Dramatic versions
of Uncle Tom’s Cabin appeared within months; George L.
Aiken’s stage production remained the most popular play in England
and America for seventy-five years. Henry James compared the many spin-offs
Stowe’s novel provoked to “a wonderful leaping fish”
that “fluttered down” around the globe. Modern theatergoers
may know “The Small Cabin of Uncle Thomas,” the version that
appears in Rodgers and Hammerstein’s musical "The King and
I."
The political influence of Uncle Tom’s Cabin can be measured
by who talked about it or who used it as a rationale for action. Exhibit
A is the remark supposedly made by President Lincoln when he met Stowe
in 1862: “So you’re the little woman who wrote the book that
started this Great War.” True or not, its circulation is testament
to both Lincoln’s and Stowe’s sense of public relations. Exhibit
B is everyone else who saw Uncle Tom’s Cabin as revolutionary.
Frederick Douglass wrote of Uncle Tom’s Cabin that “nothing
could have better suited the moral and humane requirements of the hour.
Its effect was amazing, instantaneous, and universal.” It was banned
in the South and nearly banned by the Vatican. It was also banned in tsarist
Russia, but apparently Uncle Tom’s Cabin was Lenin’s
favorite book as a youth. Woodrow Wilson wrote that Uncle Tom’s
Cabin “played no small part in creating the anti-slavery party.”
Yet in the twentieth century, Malcolm X suggested that it wasn’t
radical enough, claiming that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a “modern”
Uncle Tom, “who is doing the same thing today, to keep Negroes defenseless
in the face of an attack.”
Rather than “a book that made history,” Uncle Tom’s
Cabin is a novel that matters because it is still provokes argument.
Many modern readers wish Uncle Tom would stop praying and serving and
do something. W.E.B. DuBois saw Tom’s “deep religious fatalism”
as an example of the stunted ethical growth endemic to plantation existence,
where “habits of shiftlessness took root, and sullen hopelessness
replaced hopeful strife.” In Nabokov’s Lolita, the porter
who carries the bags to the hotel room where Humbert Humbert will first
have his way with his young stepdaughter is called “Uncle Tom.”
He will not get involved. Unfounded as the term and the application may
be, “Uncle Tom” remains, even today, the standard epithet
for any black man who serves whites and does not carry a gun. Indeed,
in recent history, the term as been applied to Dr. King, Clarence Thomas,
Colin Powell, and Barack Obama.
Much of the cussing and discussing of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle
Tom’s Cabin comes from those who haven’t actually read
the book. Those who have know that the power of Stowe’s novel resides
in the dozens of her characters who enter our consciousness by acting
fully human: Senator Bird, who reluctantly agrees that the letter of the
Fugitive Slave Law does not trump his Christian duty to break the law
and help the runaway Eliza and her son; Marie St. Clare, vain and whiny,
who sees her daughter Eva’s death as a personal affront; Ophelia,
the prim Vermonter who finds slavery and blacks equally abhorrent; Augustine
St. Clare and Arthur Shelby, thoughtful and good-hearted but utterly weak;
and Sam, whose “comic inefficiency,” critic Kenneth Lynn writes,
“no American author before Mrs. Stowe had realized…could constitute
a studied insult to the white man’s intelligence.” To read
and take seriously the entirety of Uncle Tom’s Cabin is
to see why it matters not as an historical or political phenomenon but
as a relentless and passionate work of literary fiction.
Bibliography:
Briggs, Charles. “Uncle Tomitudes” [unsigned], Putnam’s
Monthly, January 1853.
DuBois, W.E.B. Souls of Black Folk. Chapter X, “Faith of
our Fathers,” 140.
Furnas, J.C. Goodbye to Uncle Tom. Ann Arbor, MI: W. Sloane Associates,
1956.
Douglass, Frederick. Life and Times of Frederick Douglass Written
by Himself (facsimile edition). New York: Citadel Press, 1983. 289.
James, Henry. A Small Boy and Others. New York: Charles Scribners
Sons, 1913.
Lynn, Kenneth, ed. Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Cambridge: Belknap
Press, 1962.
Nabokov, Vladimir. Lolita. New York: Random House, c1992.
Parfait, Claire. The Publishing History of Uncle Tom’s Cabin,
1852-2002. Ashgate Press.
Service, Robert. Lenin: A Biography. Boston: Harvard University
Press, 2002.
Tolstoy, Leo, What is Art? (reprint edition, originally published
1896) Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1996. N152.
Wilson, Woodrow, Division and Reunion, 1829-1889. New York: Logmans,
Green, and Company, 1893. 181.
Malcolm X interviews from "The Negro and the American Promise,"
WGBH, 1963. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/mlk/sfeature/sf_video.html
Hollis Robbins, Ph.D, is the co-editor with Henry Louis
Gates, Jr. of The Annotated Uncle Tom's Cabin (W.W. Norton, 2006)
and The Selected Writings of William Wells Brown (Oxford University
Press, 2006) with Paula Garret. She is a member of the Humanities Faculty
at The Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University.
|