Ratification Debates: A New York Case Study
by Catherine Turso
Background: The Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia
in the summer of 1787 was full of conflict and compromise. Yet as the
convention drew to a close, some of the biggest debates were just beginning.
According to the Constitution, nine of the thirteen states needed to ratify
the document before it could go into effect (although most acknowledged
that without the support of all the states, the government would struggle
with legitimacy). It would take almost three years for all thirteen states
to ratify the Constitution. Some states ratified quickly, with little
debate. But some of the most powerful states including Massachusetts,
Virginia and New York became battlegrounds between those who supported
ratification of the Constitution, the Federalists, and those who opposed
it, the Anti-Federalists. New York was the last of those states to ratify
the Constitution with a close vote of 30 in favor and 27 against. New
York delegates joined in the call for a Bill of Rights to be added to
the Constitution as a condition for ratification.
This lesson is designed to impress upon students that the Constitution,
a document so revered today, was hotly debated at its inception. The lesson
also asks students to consider what may have shaped the differing viewpoints
on the Constitution. This particular case study is set in New York, but
the activity could be set in any of the states that had a strong debate
over ratification. Objectives
- Students will analyze primary documents in order to identify differing
views on the ratification of the Constitution.
- Students will apply their understanding of these viewpoints as they
develop profiles for fictional characters.
- Students will debate ratification from various positions in a town
hall forum.
- Students will be able to explain why New Yorkers (and Americans in
general) disagreed on ratification of the Constitution.
Activity 1 – Motivation
- In groups, pairs or individually, have students examine a chart or
map listing each of the states, when they ratified the Constitution,
and how many votes were cast for and against ratification. Ask students
to list:
- General Observations
- Observations about your state’s Ratification Vote
- Questions raised by the information
For a map detailing ratification see:
http://www.cqpress.com/incontext/constitution/docs/struggle_
ratification.html
For a chart of the state-by-state ratification vote see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitution
- Debrief: As a class, chart students’ observations and questions.
Give students a couple of minutes to brainstorm theories on why New
York was one of the last states to ratify the Constitution and why the
vote was so close. Add theories to the chart.
Activity 2: Understanding the Viewpoints
- Mini-Lecture or reading on the ratification process.
- Review of Constitutionial Convention
- Rules for Ratification
- Groups that form – Federalists & Anti-Federalists
- Methods of arguing positions – Federalist Papers and other
anonymous writings published in newspapers, debates at ratification
conferences, etc…
A one-page reading on ratifying the Constitution is available through
Gilder Lehrman at http://www.gilderlehrman.org/teachers/module2/intro_pop14.html
Carol Berkin’s A Brilliant Solution also has a great
overview of the ratification process with details on each states ratification
battle.
- Give students (in pairs or groups) a packet of primary documents on
ratification of the Constitution representing a variety of viewpoints.
For each document have students:
- Identify the source – Who is the author? What do you know
about the author?
- Read each document excerpt carefully, looking up unfamiliar vocabulary.
- Identify the viewpoint – What is the author’s position
on the Constitution (Federalist/ Anti-Federalist)? What are the
author’s main arguments?
- Brainstorm: What other American’s would be most likely to
agree with this author’s position?
Note: Choose a range of document excerpts based on time available
and reading level of students. Teachers may want to give different
groups different sets of documents. For more of a challenge, the link
below each document will take the students to the full text.
Click
here for a printable handout of document excerpts
Gilder Lehrman also offers a short set of primary source documents
on Ratification:
http://www.gilderlehrman.org/teachers/module2/tool_is_pop1.html
- Debrief: As a class, chart the documents as Federalist or Anti-Federalist.
Then have students discuss the arguments used in the documents on each
side with the rest of the class.
Activity 3: Town Hall Meeting on Ratification Scenario:
New York State’s ratifying convention is set to take place next
month (summer of 1788). A local delegate is holding a town hall meeting
to hear the views of his constituency before he votes.
Each group of students will take on an identity and prepare the character’s
position on the ratification of the Constitution. At the town hall meeting,
each group will work together and argue his/her position in an effort
to persuade the delegate.
- Assign each group one of the following identities. For homework, research
the lives of real Americans with the same identity during the 1780’s
focusing on their role in society, their political and economic power,
what their business priorities may be and what struggles they may be
facing.
- Owner of a large shipping company
- Large land owner
- Farmer with a small farm
- Shopkeeper
- Sailor working on ships out of New York Harbor
- Enslaved African day laborer in New York City
- In groups, have students formulate their character’s position
on the Constitution.
- Share research and write up a brief profile for your character.
- Review your notes on arguments for and against the ratification
of the Constitution.
- As a group, decide what position you think your character would
take. List at least two reasons for your decision.
- Extension Option: In order for students to get a sense
of other perspectives that will be presented during the town hall
meeting, have all the students, or a representative from each group,
mingle in character for 5 to 10 minutes discussing their views on
the Constitution. Then have students return to groups and share
their perspectives.
- Prepare for the Town Hall Meeting: Each group’s goal is to convince
the delegate (the teacher or an outside guest) to vote for or against
ratification.
- As a group, write down at least three arguments for or against
ratification of the Constitution. Be sure to base your responses
both on the primary documents AND the logical perspective of your
character.
- Brainstorm opposing arguments and discuss how your group will
respond.
- Select group members to deliver the opening and closing statements
and to present the group’s arguments.
- Town Hall Meeting
- Arrange the room so groups can see one another. Give each group
a placard with their character’s identity.
- Meeting protocol:
- Opening Statements: Each group has 2 minutes to introduce
themselves and their position on ratification of the Constitution.
- Presentation of Arguments: The Delegate opens the floor for
arguments. Groups should take turns raising their arguments
for ratification. After 5 minutes, the delegate can open the
floor for those opposed to ratification.
- Open Debate: Give students the last 5 to 10 minutes to debate
one another over the issue of ratification. The delegate may
call up to two people arguing the same position before he/she
needs to call on someone arguing the opposing position.
- Closing statements: Each group has 1 minute to reiterate their
position and try to sway the delegate one last time.
- Give students 5 minutes to respond individually in writing to
the following: If you were the delegate, after hearing the arguments
of your constituents, which way would you vote at the ratification
convention?
Note: Students no longer need to argue the position they argued
during the Town Hall Meeting.
- Have the class vote. If time, ask several students to explain
their votes.
- Debrief Discussion: Why do you think ratification of the Constitution
was so controversial in New York? Revisit and evaluate theories from
the first activity.

Extension Activity: Essay
To better assess students’ understanding of the
different arguments about ratification of the Constitution, have students
write a 5-paragraph essay on one of the following topics:
- Recommend a position on ratification (again, not necessarily based
on the position they argued in class).
- Why do you think ratification of the Constitution was so controversial
in New York?
|