The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History
Home The Institute For Teachers and Students For Historians The Collection Upcoming Events
Search the Site:

Within this Section
Overview
Summer Seminars for Teachers
To Apply
2004 Seminar Document Projects
National Parks Service Seminars
Seminars for College Profesors


George Washington to New Hampshire, 29 December 1777
(Detail, GLC03706)
North American Slavery in Comparative Perspective:
Slave Codes

by Brandy Reazer
McKenney Hills Center, Silver Spring, MD


Source Background Information Document Text Questions



The Code Noir of Louisiana, 1724
Slave Codes of the State of Georgia, 1848




In order for slavery to survive as an institution, slave codes or laws had to be created to maintain order. The slave codes were established by governments for slave owners to follow as well as for non-slave owning whites. If the institution of slavery was to endure, all members of society had to follow these codes. The Code Noir of Louisiana, 1724 and the Slave Codes of Georgia, were just two examples of slave codes created to maintain order and establish control.






Code Noir of Louisiana, 1724 (Selected)

A Royal Edict Touching on the State and Discipline of the Black Slaves of Louisiana, Given at Versailles in the Month of March 1724

Louis, by the grace of God, King of France and Navarre, to all present and to come, Salvation. . . . We have judged that it was a matter of our authority and our justice, for the conservation of this colony, to establish there a law and certain rules to maintain there the discipline of the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church and to arrange that which concerns the state and quality of slaves in the said Isles. . . .

XXVII
The slave who will have struck his master, his mistress, the husband of his mistress, or their children, either in the face or resulting in a bruise or the outpouring of blood, will be punished by death.

XXVIII
And as to abuse and assault that will be committed by slaves against free persons, we wish that they be severely punished, even by death if it falls due. . . .

XXXVIII
We also forbid all of our subjects of the said country, of whatever quality or condition they may be, to engage in, or by their private authority to have others engage in, the torture or the racking of slaves, under whatever pretext it may be; nor to do them, or to have others do them, any mutilation, under pain of confiscation of the slaves and of being proceeded against extraordinarily. We permit them [masters], when they believe their slaves will have merited it, only to bind them and to beat them with rods or cords.

XXXIX
We order the officers of justice established in the said country to proceed criminally against the masters and overseers who will have killed their slaves or will have mutilated them while under their power or under their direction and to punish the murder according to the atrocity of the circumstances. In case their is cause to discharge them, we permit the dismissal of the masters as well as the overseers without there being need to obtain from us letters of grace.

XL
We wish that the slaves be considered personal property . . .


Slave Codes of the State of Georgia, 1848 (Selected)


SEC. I. CAPITAL OFFENCES.

1. Capital crimes when punished with death.
The following shall be considered as capital offences, when committed by a slave or free person of color: insurrection, or an attempt to excite it; committing a rape, or attempting it on a free white female; murder of a free white person, or murder of a slave or free person of color, or poisoning of a human being; every and each of these offences shall, on conviction, be punished with death.

2. When punished by death, or at discretion of the court.
And the following, also, shall be considered as capital offences, when committed by a slave or free person of color: assaulting a free white person with intent to murder, or with a weapon likely to produce death; maiming a free white person; burglary, or arson of any description; also, any attempt to poison a human being; every and each of these offences shall, on conviction, be punished with death, or such other punishment as the court in their judgement shall think most proportionate to the offence, and best promote the object of the law, and operate as a preventive for like offences in future.

3. Punishment for manslaughter.
And in case a verdict of manslaughter shall be found by the jury, the punishment shall be by whipping, at the discretion of the court, and branded on the cheek with the letter M.






1. Who is the author of these documents?

2. Are there any differences in punishment between 1724 and 1848? Explain.

3. What are there differences in punishment for offenses committed by slaves, free persons, and whites? Who is punished more harshly in each document?

4. What is meant by "personal property?" How does the definition of personal property differ in each document?

5. Who is the authority figure in both documents? Why do you think that the slave owner can be punished for killing his slave in 1724?



Join the mailing list for the Gilder Lehrman Institute

For Teachers and Students Seminars Summer Seminars for Teachers To Apply