Jackson, Andrew (1767-1845) to John C. Calhoun
High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also order a pdf of the image from us here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC04872 Author/Creator: Jackson, Andrew (1767-1845) Place Written: Nashville, Tennessee Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 26 June 1820 Pagination: 3 p. : docket ; 30.8 x 19.4 cm.
General Jackson writing to Secretary of War Calhoun, attempting to mediate a dispute between General Daniel Bissell and the Ordnance Department. Jackson emphasizes the need to maintain a proper chain of command.
…He alone is the competent Judge of the necessity; and he is liable to punishment for any infringement of the rule, when that necessity does not exist; and it is clear to me that the powers of the role had such cases [inserted: in] View, or else the exception is worse than useless.
…Experience and common sense forbids such a construction, and demands that he who is responsible for the command, should be permitted to determine when a necessity for his acting with efficiency exists. In my opinion this is the true construction to be given to the rule; and of such an interpretation cannot be given to it, the sooner it is expunged the better; for it is subversive of subordination and all military principles.
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.