Scott, Winfield (1786-1866) [Notice of suspension of habeas corpus in Boston to Justin Dimick].
High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also order a pdf of the image from us here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC00638 Author/Creator: Scott, Winfield (1786-1866) Place Written: Washington, D.C. Type: Manuscript document signed Date: 19 October 1861 Pagination: 2 p. + blank Order a Copy
Scott quotes an Abraham Lincoln document suspending the writ of habeas corpus, countersigned by William H. Seward. Scott empowers Brevet Colonel Dimick to do the same in Boston. Also signed by Assistant Adjutant General E.D. Townsend.
Headquarters of the Army.
Washington. October 19. 1861.
The Undersigned General-in-Chief of the Army, has received from the President of the United States the following Communication : -
To Lieutenant General Winfield Scott.
The Military line of the United States for the suppression of the insurrection may be extended so far as Bangor in Maine. You and any officer acting under your authority, are hereby authorized to suspend the writ of Habeas Corpus in any place between that place and the City of Washington -
( Signed ) Abraham Lincoln.
Washington, 14th, October 1861.
By the President.
( Signed ) William H. Seward
Secretary of State.
In
[2] In accordance with the foregoing warrant, the undersigned devolves on Brevet Colonel Justin Dimick, U.S. Army, commanding Fort Warren, Boston Harbor, a like authority within the limits of the City and Harbor of Boston, to Execute in all proper cases the instructions of the President.
Winfield Scott
By Command:
ED Townsend
Asst. Adjt. Genl.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.