Online access and copy requests are not available for this item. You may request to be notified of when this becomes available digitally.
- GLC#
- GLC05959.80.07-View header record
- Type
- Newspapers
- Date
- 24 March 1864
- Author/Creator
- Tyler & Allegre, fl. 1862-1865
- Title
- The daily richmond enquirer. [Vol. 36, no. 96 (March 24, 1864)]
- Place Written
- Richmond, Virginia
- Pagination
- 2 p. : Height: 68 cm, Width: 47 cm
- Primary time period
- Civil War and Reconstruction, 1861-1877
- Sub-Era
- The American Civil War
Proclamation of Jefferson Davis for a day of fasting and prayer. Article on the reorganization of the Maryland Line. Article titled "Charleston Impregnable from the Sea Approaches," which states "Charleston will not be taken from the sea approaches, and therefore that the land forces now here may, ere long be withdrawn." Article from the "New York Times" stating that letters found on the body of Colonel Dahlgren were forgeries -- the "Times" claims that Federal troops would never kill Jefferson Davis and his cabinet when they reach Richmond. Police items on a slave woman involved in a theft and a "mulatto woman" charged with assault. Note that North Carolina Governor Zebulon B. Vance arrived in Richmond the day before. Description of the execution of David Owen Dodd, a 17 year old Confederate spy, by Federal troops in Little Rock, Arkansas. Page 2 article on the recent history of Mexico. Printed letter of Virginia Governor William Smith on exemptions from the draft, which appears to have been marked in pen.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
- Copyright Notice
- The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.