Online access and copy requests are not available for this item. You may request to be notified of when this becomes available digitally.
- GLC#
- GLC08599.12
- Type
- Books & pamphlets
- Date
- 1862
- Author/Creator
- Taney, Roger Brooke, 1777-1864
- Title
- Decision of Chief Justice Taney, in the Merryman case, upon the writ of habeas corpus.
- Place Written
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Pagination
- 1 v. : 16 p. : Height: 22.5 cm, Width: 14.5 cm
- Primary time period
- Civil War and Reconstruction, 1861-1877
- Sub-Era
- The American Civil War
Published by John Campbell. Second addition. Taney states "The Constitution provides, as I have before said, that 'no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.' It declares that 'the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effect, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated' ... It provides that the party accused shall be entitled to a speedy trial in a Court of justice. And these great and fundamental laws, which Congress, itself, could not suspend, have been disregarded, and suspended, like the Writ of Habeas Corpus, by a military order, supported by force of arms ... I have exercised all the power which the Constitution and laws confer on me, but that power had been resisted by a force too strong for me to overcome..." Cover is missing. This pamphlet is in fragile condition. Duplicate of GLC08557.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
- Copyright Notice
- The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.