Online access and copy requests are not available for this item. You may request to be notified of when this becomes available digitally.
- GLC#
- GLC09611.372-View header record
- Type
- Letters
- Date
- 9 October 1944
- Author/Creator
- Graeff, Leonard Eugene, 1920-2016
- Title
- to Susan Prowell Graeff and Raymond James Graeff
- Place Written
- Hawaii
- Pagination
- 3 p. : envelope
- Primary time period
- Great Depression and World War II, 1929-1945
- Sub-Era
- World War II
One letter from Leonard Eugene Graeff to Susan Prowell Graeff and Raymond James Graeff dated October 9, 1944. He has not received many letters but believes it is because June is about to go on to college and has been studying a lot. He is hoping that Susan is okay and the reason she hasn’t written isn’t because of her health. He received a box from Mrs. Ross and plans to use the tonic she sent that night. He also received the Bethlehem Steel news that Susan forwarded as well as the church bulletin and a newsletter from Miss Shoemaker. He received a letter from Florence Huber and from Dottie Shearer. He also inquires about a supplement in the evening news geared towards source servicemen and wonders if Susan could send that. He had another idea for Christmas, and would like black socks.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
- Copyright Notice
- The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.