Online access and copy requests are not available for this item. You may request to be notified of when this becomes available digitally.
- GLC#
- GLC09640.044-View header record
- Type
- Newspapers
- Date
- May 1973
- Author/Creator
- American Civil Liberties Union
- Title
- Civil Liberties [No. 296 (May 1973)]
- Place Written
- New York, New York
- Pagination
- 8 p. : Height: 29 cm, Width: 22.5 cm
- Primary time period
- 1945 to the Present
One issue of "Civil Liberties" dated May 1973 printed by the American Civil Liberties Union. Front cover consists of an image of an armed American Indian sitting on a horse. Articles in the publication related to ACLU working to provide legal aid to the American Indian Movement, the National Indian Youth Council, and indigenous people in Oklahoma; updates on the "Saving Legal Services" column referring to the Legal Services program within the Office of Economic Opportunity during Nixon's administration; an article regarding a decision pertaining to the First Amendment, the "fairness doctrine" and television and radio licensing; book reviews; highlighting employers that have removed questions related to arrrest records on job applications; a Muslim man who won the right to wear a skullcap while being held at the Litchfield prison in Connecticut.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
- Copyright Notice
- The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.