Buchanan, James (1791-1868) [Pardon of John Litzer, David Frank, William Schmidt, Herman Julius and Charles Hoffman for rape].
High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also order a pdf of the image from us here.
A high-resolution version of this object is available for registered users. LOG IN
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC00045.16 Author/Creator: Buchanan, James (1791-1868) Place Written: Washington, D.C. Type: Document signed Date: 20 March 1860 Pagination: 2 p. ; 40 x 27 cm Order a Copy
Countersigned by Secretary of State Lewis Cass. The men were sentenced in March, 1858. Pardoned by Buchanan for insufficient evidence after a petition was presented to him stating that Victoria Fugleman, who had said the men had raped her, had recanted her testimony.
TRANSCRIPT GLC 45.16
James Buchanan. Manuscript Document Signed:
[Illegible]
[illegible]
Attorney Generals Office
March 19, 1860
Sir:
I am directed by the President to request you to issue a warrant with the following recital for the pardon of John A. Litzer, David Frank, William Schmitt, Herman Julius and Charles Hoffman.
Whereas at the March [illegible] 1858 of the [illegible] Court for the District of Columbia, John A. Litzer, David Frank, William Schmidt, Herman Julius and Charles Hoffman were convicted of rape upon the person of Victoria Fugleman, and were by the said court sentenced as follows: the said Litzer, Frank, and Schmidt and Julius each to imprisonment in the Penitentiary of the District of Columbia for the period of twelve [2] years and the said Hoffman to imprisonment in the said Penitentiary for the period of fifteen years;
And whereas, having examined the record carefully, I have become satisfied that the evidence was not the such a character as would justified their conviction;
And whereas, the District Attorney has strongly expressed his conviction that the parties are innocent of the crime whereof they were convicted and ought to be discharged;
Now therefore &
Respectfully yours &
By direction of Attorney General:
JMCooper
(Pardon Clerk)
Hon. Lewis Cap
Secretary of State
To his Excellency James Buchanan President of the United States . . ..
We the undersigned Citizens of Washington respectfully represent to your [illegible] that at the March term of the Criminal Court of the District of Columbia for the County of Washington held in the year 1958 the following persons to wit. John A. Litzer. David. [illegible]. William Schmidt. Herman Julius and Charles Hoffman- (Germans) were severally tried on the charge of committing a Rape on [illegible] Victoria Fuglman on the 14th day of April [illegible] and convicted. And that the said Litzer Frank Schmidt and Julius were each sentenced by the said Court to suffer imprisonment and labor in the penitentiary for the District of Columbia for the period of twelve years for the 1st day of May 1858 and the said Charles Hoffman was sentenced by the Court to suffer imprisonment and labor in the penitentiary aforesaid for the period of fifteen years from the 4th day of May1858. And that they are now confined in the said Penitentiary under and by Authority of the judgments of the said Court (as by reference to a certified
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.