Washington, George (1732-1799) to James McHenry
High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also order a pdf of the image from us here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC00204 Author/Creator: Washington, George (1732-1799) Place Written: Mount Vernon, Virginia Type: Autograph letter signed Date: 05 May 1799 Pagination: 3 p. : address : docket ; 24.4 x 20 cm. Order a Copy
Marked private. In response to McHenry's private letter of April 29, which was a response to Washington's letter of April 23. Washington, commander of the Provisional Army created in 1798 in response to French aggression, wrote to McHenry, Secretary of War in the Adams Administration, on the issue of rank and pay in the army. Officers who lived farther away from the capital received their commissions later than those who lived closer. Since rank was calculated by time of acceptance, those living farther away felt slighted. He agrees with the solution that McHenry suggested to the President and hopes it is approved. Mentions Charles Fenton Mercer, who pressed Washington for a commission and then twice declined the offer when he realized it would hurt him politically in Virginia. Says "I am glad he has refused it." Offers suggestions to fill the vacancy.
Notes: Fitzpatrick, Writings of Washington, 37: 201-202.
Signer of the U.S. Constitution.
Mount Vernon 5. May 1799
Private
My Dear Sir,
Your private letter of the 29. Ulto. was received yesterday, and require but a short reply.
From an observation of yours, in answer to my letter of the 23d. Ulto, I perceive my meaning with respect to the settlement of relative Rank, has been misunderstood; or, if taken properly, I must adhere to the opinion I gave of the injustice which would be inflicted upon the Officers of States remote from the Seat of Government; if those in the vicinity of it are to Rank before them, because they were on the spot to announce the acceptance of their Appointments at an earlier day.
Rank & Pay are distinct things; the Officer who [inserted: may have] received the latter to day, sustain no injury from him who received it yesterday but if the commencement of Rank in the same grades, is to be regulated (under the circumstances I have mentioned) [inserted: from the dates of their acceptances] it will have injustice stamped on the face of it: for in that case those [2] who are most remote, not by any act avoidable in themselves, but from the nature of things, become in almost every instance juniors; when perhaps many of them, in consideration of former Services, or other weighty pretensions might, justly, be entitled to Seniority.
The mode which you have suggested to the President for settling the Rank of the field Officers, is, certainly the best that could be offered to his consideration; and I trust will be approved by him.
Let the vacancy, occasioned by the non acceptance of Mr. Mercer be filled by whomsoever it may, I am glad he has refused it. But, in the name of common modesty, what did this young Gentleman expect? The command of the Regim[ent]? Upon the principle w[hi]ch governed the Board of General Officers in assigning the present addition to it, I think it would be injudicious to fill the Vacancy from a quarter that did not occasion it; Nor can it be better filled, I believe, than with the appointment of Turner, or Randolph, the first of whom [inserted: is] spoken of as possessing talents peculiarly adapted to this Service.
What is the determination of Watts?
[3] With very great esteem and regard
I am - My dear Sir
Your Most Obedient and Affectionate Hble Servt.
Go: Washington
James McHenry Esqr.
5 May 1799
Go: Washington
Acknowledged
The 9th May.
James McHenry Esq.
Private
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.