![Columbian centinel. [Vol. 17, no. 29 (June 20, 1792)]. GLC01998.02](https://d16sa08ayyuei.cloudfront.net/GLC01998.02/GLC01998.02_00001.jpg)
A larger version of this object is available to teachers and students for free. Others can subscribe for $25/year.
Larger images are also available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription or click here for more information.
- GLC#
- GLC01998.02
- Type
- Newspapers
- Date
- 20 June 1792
- Author/Creator
- Russell, Benjamin, 1761-1845
- Title
- Columbian centinel. [Vol. 17, no. 29 (June 20, 1792)].
- Place Written
- Boston, Massachusetts
- Pagination
- 4 p. : Height: 43.4 cm, Width: 26.9 cm
- Primary time period
- The New Nation, 1783-1815
- Sub-Era
- The Early Republic
Benjamin Russell listed as the printer and publisher, located on State Street. Discusses the newly established United States Mint, enacted by the United States Congress on Monday October 21, 1791 and approved by the President May 8, 1792. Lists Jonathan Trumbull as Speaker of the House of Representatives, Richard Henry Lee as President pro tempore of the Senate, George Washington as President of the United States, and Thomas Jefferson as Secretary of State.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
- Copyright Notice
- The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.