Sumner, Charles (1811-1874) The Crime Against Kansas. Speech of Hon. Charles Sumner, of Massachusetts. In the Senate of the United States, May 19, 1856.
High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also order a pdf of the image from us here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC02095.20 Author/Creator: Sumner, Charles (1811-1874) Place Written: New York, New York Type: Pamphlet Date: 1856 Pagination: 31 p. ; 23 x 15 cm. Order a Copy
Sumner delivered this speech after the May 1856 debates on slavery in Kansas. Condemns Southern advocacy of the expansion of slavery. Published by Greeley and McElrath, New York. Advertised on cover page as being "for sale at the office of the New York Tribune." With advertisements for other publications on the back cover.
Congressman Preston Brooks of South Carolina believed that Sumner had insulted his uncle, Senator Andrew Butler, in this two day oration against slavery. In retaliation, Brooks used his cane to beat Sumner unconscious in the Senate chamber 22 May 1856. The South applauded Brooks, while the North used the caning to symbolize the savagery and brutality of the South. Sumner did not fully recover, or return to his Senate seat, until 1859.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.