Our Collection

At the Institute’s core is the Gilder Lehrman Collection, one of the great archives in American history. More than 85,000 items cover five hundred years of American history, from Columbus’s 1493 letter describing the New World through the end of the twentieth century.

Advanced Search
Back to Collection Search

Harris & Ewing (fl. 1937) [Portrait of Supreme Court Justices]

Order a pdf of this item here.

Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC02929.02 Author/Creator: Harris & Ewing (fl. 1937) Place Written: Washington, D.C. Type: Photograph signed Date: circa 1962 Pagination: 1 photograph : b&w ; 28 x 35.3 cm. Order a Copy

Formal group portrait of the Supreme Court Justices in robes. Signed by justices William O. Douglas, Hugo L. Black, Earl Warren, Felix Frankfurter, Tom Clark, Charles E. Whittaker, John Marshall Harlan, William J. Brennan Jr., and Potter Stewart.

Harris & Ewing, fl. 1905-1977
Warren, Earl, 1891-1974
Clark, Tom Campbell, 1899-1977
Whittaker, Charles Evans, 1901-1973
Black, Hugo LaFayette, 1886-1971
Douglas, William Orville, 1898-1980
Harlan, John M. (John Marshall), 1899-1971
Brennan, William Joseph, 1906-1997
Frankfurter, Felix, 1882-1965
Stewart, Potter, 1915-1985
1945 to the Present
Supreme Court
Judiciary
Government and Civics
Law
The Sixties

Citation Guidelines for Online Resources

The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.