Images of this object are available online to Collection subscribers.
- GLC#
- GLC00319.02-View header record
- Type
- Documents
- Date
- 11 June 1862
- Author/Creator
- Loomis, Gustavus, 1789-1872
- Title
- to Lorenzo Thomas
- Place Written
- Fort Columbus, New York
- Pagination
- 1 p. : endorsement signed Height: 24.7 cm, Width: 19.6 cm
- Primary time period
- Civil War and Reconstruction, 1861-1877
- Sub-Era
- The American Civil War
Transmits correspondence from Confederate Colonel Charles H. Olmstead to Edwin M. Stanton, Secretary of War (see GLC00319.01) concerning the alleged violation of the surrender terms of Fort Pulaski. Autograph endorsement signed by Major General David Hunter, 7 July 1862, from Hilton Head, South Carolina stating it was received 27 June 1862 and referred to Hunter for report on instructions from Stanton. Hunter then endorses the letter on 7 July 1862 from Hilton Head, South Carolina and states that, "The surrender of Fort Pulaski was unconditional. Capt. Gillmore had no authority from me to make any terms of capitulation." Loomis signs as Colonel, 5th Infantry. He would later be brevetted brigadier general. Hunter, an 1822 graduate of West Point, was commissioned major general of volunteers in 1861. He is most noted for his 1862 proclamation to free enslaved people in Confederate states, which was rescinded by President Lincoln.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
For reproductions and permissions, please visit our Rights and Reproductions Page.
- Copyright Notice
- The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.