Livingston Family Genealogical table of the Livingstons descended from Robert, from 1676 to 1850
High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also order a pdf of the image from us here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC03107.00001 Author/Creator: Livingston Family Place Written: [s.l.] Type: Document Date: 1676-1850 Pagination: 1 p. 46.9 x 118.7 cm Order a Copy
Complete Title: "Genealogical Table Showing the Principal Public Offices, Military Commissions, Etc., Held by Robert Livingston, First Lord of the Manor of Livingston, and His Descendants, including Men who have Married Ladies of this Family, from A.D. 1676-1850. (NB-Offices and Commissions Held under the Crown are printed in ordinary type; while all Revolutionary, State, Federal Offices, and Commissions, are printed in Italics. Unless stated otherwise the Colony or State of New York is always meant. This table does not profess to include every public office held by a Livingston, nor does it give the name of every member of the Family who held a public office within the above-mentioned period, nor is it carried beyond the Fifth Generation.)"
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.