Lincoln, Abraham (1809-1865) Speech of Hon. Abram Lincoln, in reply to Judge Douglas
High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also order a pdf of the image from us here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC02813 Author/Creator: Lincoln, Abraham (1809-1865) Place Written: Springfield, Illinois Type: Broadsheet Date: [after 26 June 1857] Pagination: 7 p. ; 30.2 x 20 cm.
Summary of Content: Delivered in Representatives' Hall, Springfield, Illinois. Replies to Judge Stephen Douglas's speech two weeks earlier on the subject of Kansas, the Dred Scott decision, and Utah. Douglas had spoken in favor of the Dred Scott decision and Lincoln's response maintains that the decision was erroneous. This address would provide the logic (and language) Lincoln used again in many of the arguments in his famous "House Divided" speech a year later. Pages are uncut.
People:
Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865
Douglas, Stephen Arnold, 1813-1861
Historical Era: National Expansion and Reform, 1815-1860
Subjects: LawWestward ExpansionSupreme CourtPresidentElectionPoliticsGovernment and CivicsBleeding KansasDred ScottAfrican American HistorySlaveryJudiciary
Sub Era: Age of Jackson
Order a Copy Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
Copyright Notice: The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.