Guided Readings: Reconstruction
by Steven Mintz
We hold it to be the duty of the government to inflict condign punishment on the rebel belligerents, and so weaken their hands that they can never again endanger the Union; and so reform their municipal institutions as to make them republican in spirit as well as in name. . . .
We propose to confiscate all the estate of every rebel belligerent whose estate was worth $l0,000, or whose land exceeded two hundred acres in quantity. . . . By thus forfeiting the estates of the leading rebels, the government would have 394,000,000 of acres. . . . Give, if you please, forty acres to each adult male freedman. Suppose there are one million of them. That would require 40,000,000 of acres. . . .
The whole fabric of Southern society must be changed. . . . How can republican institutions, free schools, free churches, free social intercourse, exist in a mingled community of nabobs and serfs; of the owners of twenty thousand acre manors with lordly palaces, and the occupants of narrow huts inhabited by “low white trash?”
—The Hon. Thaddeus Stevens, “Reconstruction: An Address Delivered to the Citizens of Lancaster,
September 6, 1865,” New York Times, September 10, 1965
Be it enacted . . . That said rebel States shall be divided into military districts and made subject to the military authority of the United States. . . . That it shall be the duty of each officer . . . to protect all persons in their rights of person and property, to suppress insurrection, disorder, and violence, and to punish, or cause to be punished, all disturbers of the public peace and criminals. . . .
—The Reconstruction Act of 1867
The power . . . given to the commanding officer over all the people of each district is that of an absolute monarch. His mere will is to take the place of all law. . . . It reduces the whole population of the ten states—all persons, of every color, sex, and condition, and every stranger within their limits—to the most abject and degrading slavery.
—President Andrew Johnson’s veto of the Reconstruction Act of 1867, March 2, 1867
Every State that seceded from the United States was a Democratic State. . . . Every man that shot Union soldiers was a Democrat. . . . Every man that loved slavery better than liberty was a Democrat. The man that assassinated Abraham Lincoln was a Democrat. . . . Every man that raised blood-hounds to pursue human beings was a Democrat. Every man that clutched from shrieking, shuddering, crouching mothers, babes from their breasts, and sold them into slavery, was a Democrat.
—Robert G. Ingersoll, Indianapolis Speech Delivered to the Veteran Soldiers of the Rebellion,
1876, in The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, vol. 9 (New York, 1900), pp. 157–158.
[Reconstruction] was the most soul-sickening spectacle that Americans had ever been called upon to behold. Every principle of the old American polity was here reversed. In place of government by the most intelligent and virtuous part of the people for the benefit of the governed, here was government by the most ignorant and vicious part of the population for the benefit, the vulgar, materialistic, brutal benefit of the governing set.
—John W. Burgess, Reconstruction and the Constitution, 1866–1876
(New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1905), pp. 263–264
In South Carolina, Mississippi and Louisiana, the proportion of Negroes was so large, their leaders of sufficient power, and the Federal control so effective, that for the years 1868–1874 the will of black labor was powerful; and so far as it was intelligently led, and had definite goals, it took perceptible steps toward public education, confiscation of large incomes, betterment of labor conditions, universal suffrage, and in some cases, distribution of land to the peasant.
—W. E. B. Du Bois, Black Reconstruction in America, 1860–1880
(New York: Russell & Russell, 1935), p. 484