Stewart, J.J. Salisbury banner. [Vol. 8, no. 54 (September 24, 1861)]
High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also order a pdf of the image from us here.
Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC05959.29.06 Author/Creator: Stewart, J.J. Place Written: Salisbury, North Carolina Type: Newspaper Date: 24 September 1861 Pagination: 4 p. ; 46 x 32 cm. Order a Copy
Letter from the Captain of the Sumter - R. Semmes.
The first section of the Stay Law is reprinted here (see previous issue). An editorial responds to letters to the editor concerning the topic of discussion.
This collection is a weekly paper, with J.J. Stewart and W.L. Saunders as editors and proprietors. The Salisbury Banner appeared as a semi-weekly from 1854 to 1861, a weekly from 1852 to 1862, a tri-weekly from 1865 to 1867, and was known as the Daily Union Banner from 1865 to 1866 and the Salisbury Daily Banner from 14 November 1865 to 30 November 1865.
Salisbury is the county seat of Rowan County, North Carolina. Named for Salisbury, England, on the banks of the Avon River, the North Carolina town was settled prior to the Revolutionary War.
Citation Guidelines for Online Resources
The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.